Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I have added to all Segal space-related entries, as well as to the Example section at category object in an (infinity,1)-category statements like
a pre-category object in is called a Segal space;
a connected pre-category object in is called a reduced Segal space;
a category object in is called a complete Segal space.
an category object in is called an n-fold complete Segal space;
That list can be further expanded. But I have to quit now.
prompted by Mike’s remark here I added to Segal space a section Examples – in 1Grpd with a remark on how a Segal space in induces a 2-category equipped with proarrows.
It’s not very polished and still sort of incomplete. But I need to quit now.
I have now also spelled out the converse construction in Examples – From a category, spelling out how for a category and a functor out of a groupoid, the “-fold comma catgeory” construction yields a Segal space , which is complete if is the core inclusion.
So far the writeup is a bit rambling, I am just writing stuff out as I go along. Eventually when I have a more leisure I should go an polish this. There should be, I suppose, a statement and proof that
(Here is “-coskeletal” if is a 1-monomorphism for all ).
This is very nice, thanks!
1 to 5 of 5