Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorStephan A Spahn
   • CommentTimeMar 10th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Stephan A Spahn
   Format: MarkdownItexI created [[classifying (infinity,1)-topos]]. It links to the special case discussed at [[geometry (for structured (∞,1)-toposes)|structured spaces]]. The example section is in [[classifying topos]], too.

   I created classifying (infinity,1)-topos. It links to the special case discussed at structured spaces. The example section is in classifying topos, too.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeJan 7th 2016
   • (edited Jan 7th 2016)
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexIf we write at [[classifying topos]] >the presheaf topos $[FinSet_{\ast},Set]$ (where $FinSet_{\ast}$ is the category of finite pointed sets) classifies pointed objects, why not say at [[classifying (infinity,1)-topos]] >the presheaf topos $[\infty Grpd_{fin}^{\ast/}, \infty Grpd]$ classifies pointed objects? Why mention a base topos $\mathbf{H}$ in the definition? Presumably any description of $$ \mathbf{H}[X_\ast] \coloneqq PSh((\infty Grpd_{fin}^{\ast/})^{op}, \mathbf{H}) $$ should mention $\mathbf{H}$. Something like 'classifying $(\infty, 1)$-topos of pointed objects in toposes over $\mathbf{H}$'?

   If we write at classifying topos

   the presheaf topos $[FinSet_{\ast},Set]$ (where $FinSet_{\ast}$ is the category of finite pointed sets) classifies pointed objects,

   why not say at classifying (infinity,1)-topos

   the presheaf topos $[\infty Grpd_{fin}^{\ast/}, \infty Grpd]$ classifies pointed objects?

   Why mention a base topos $\mathbf{H}$ in the definition?

   Presumably any description of

   $$\mathbf{H}[X_\ast] \coloneqq PSh((\infty Grpd_{fin}^{\ast/})^{op}, \mathbf{H})$$

   should mention $\mathbf{H}$. Something like ’classifying $(\infty, 1)$-topos of pointed objects in toposes over $\mathbf{H}$’?

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeJan 12th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat happened to [[classifying (∞,1)-topos]]? I just see a couple of links now. Did someone roll it back?

   What happened to classifying (∞,1)-topos? I just see a couple of links now. Did someone roll it back?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 12th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexHm, did this just change recently, or did we fail to notice this all along: the spelling _[[classifying (infinity,1)-topos]]_ gives the entry with the content. I have (re?)adjusted the redirects now.

   Hm, did this just change recently, or did we fail to notice this all along: the spelling classifying (infinity,1)-topos gives the entry with the content. I have (re?)adjusted the redirects now.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeJan 12th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexI see. I guess nothing's changed.

   I see. I guess nothing’s changed.