Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 15th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexat _[[implication]]_ there is currently the statement > $ q \to r \vdash (p \to q) \to (q \to r) $, That's a typo, right?

   at implication there is currently the statement

   $q \to r \vdash (p \to q) \to (q \to r)$,

   That’s a typo, right?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorZhen Lin
   • CommentTimeMar 15th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Zhen Lin
   Format: MarkdownItexWell, it's correct, though probably $q \to r \vdash (p \to q) \to (p \to r)$ is meant.

   Well, it’s correct, though probably $q \to r \vdash (p \to q) \to (p \to r)$ is meant.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeMar 16th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexI made that typo; and worse, I seem to have consistently reversed syntax and semantics! Fixed.

   I made that typo; and worse, I seem to have consistently reversed syntax and semantics! Fixed.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeSep 20th 2012
   • (edited Sep 20th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have edited _[[implication]]_ a little bit, making the definition section point to _[[hypothetical judgement]]_ where it discusses entailment, and adding a brief remark towards the end on the relation to function types.

   I have edited implication a little bit, making the definition section point to hypothetical judgement where it discusses entailment, and adding a brief remark towards the end on the relation to function types.