Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 19th 2012
    • (edited Mar 19th 2012)

    Since its creation, the entry étale map started out as wanting to be about the abstraction of the notion of local homeomorphism and étale morphism to more general contexts.

    I have added references to such axiomatizations now. But I am not sure that it is good to have “étale map” be interpreted so much differently from “étale morphism”. I think both of these should point to the same page, which discusses the general abstract notion, and then what currently is étale morphism should be renamed to “étale morphism of schemes”.

    Finally, I changed the wording of the Idea-section at the beginning of étale map: it used to say that an étale map is like a “local isomorphism”. As we have recently seen in discussion, this is a very misleading thing to say, since it is not like a local isomorphism but like a local homeomorphism. These two concepts, maybe unfortunately termed, are not about the same idea.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 19th 2012
    • (edited Mar 19th 2012)

    I wrote:

    But I am not sure that it is good to have “étale map” be interpreted so much differently from “étale morphism”. I think both of these should point to the same page, which discusses the general abstract notion, and then what currently is étale morphism should be renamed to “étale morphism of schemes”.

    I went ahead and implemented this. Give me a minute or two now to clear the cache to avoid the cache bug kicking in…

    So there is now

    1. etale map = etale morphism pointing to the general notion

    2. etale morphism of schemes.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 25th 2013

    At etale map I removed the following stubby lines, as they are redundant by the discussion at etale morphism of schemes:


    An étale map between commutative rings is usually called a étale morphism of rings: a ring homomorphism with the property that, when viewed as a morphism between affine schemes, it is étale. See this comment by Harry Gindi for a purely ring-theoretic characterisation.

    +– {: .query}

    Zoran: that is the infinitesimal lifting property for smooth morphisms, need an additional condition in general.

    =–


    By the way, Zoran has still another old query box sitting at etale map. would be nice if somebody would take care of editing this.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)