Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
  1. Hi people, I would like to know if there is any package that I might be missing because whenever this function is called, it is rendered as a crazy square. What should I do?
  2. What should I do?
    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009

    You probably need to install some fonts. (I can see things like $\mathcal{P}$ on the Lab fine.)

    It all works better if you use Firefox (or almost any modern browser other than Internet Explorer). This page talks about what you can download to see MathML characters in Firefox. Jacques Distler (who's behind the software that the Lab runs on) recommends the STIX fonts, but I use the DejaVu fonts instead. (Sometimes the square-root signs and such are the wrong size, but mostly I find that they look better.)

    If you say what browser you're using on what operating system, including the version numbers, then people might be able to give more specific advice.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeJun 26th 2009

    Sounds like a font issue: crazy squares are usually indicative of this. But by "here" do you mean on the lab or the forum? A good thing to look at is Jason Bevin's test pages for the iTeX package: here

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2009
    Strangely enough this font problem depends on the character in the alphabet. For example, on my laptop with firefox, I can render $\mathcal{B}$ but can not render $\mathcal{A}$.
    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2009
    • (edited Jul 14th 2009)

    In that case, I'll bet that you can handle

    BEFHILMRego
    

    and only those, because these were added earlier to Unicode. (See the W3C page on mathcal.)

    For a test, see the bottom of the Sandbox currently. (H'm, DejaVu Sans is a bit funny here, while DejaVu Serif is OK.)

    It might be a good idea to avoid using characters from the extended (high bit) Unicode field. Technically, even mathit should come from that field, but that's not how browsers do it today, while with mathcal they do.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJul 15th 2009

    (Note that the text font comes first on the Sandbox; but it's the math font that really matters.)

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)