Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2012
    • (edited Apr 27th 2012)

    James Wallbridge put on the arXiv a paper derived from his thesis. I’ve linked to both from his page here. Urs, in particular, was interested in seeing a copy

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2012
    • (edited Apr 27th 2012)

    Thanks +1! I have added the links also to the pointer to his thesis that was at the bottom of Tannaka duality. Am reading…

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2012

    Ah, nonabelian ∞-gerbes in def. 4.11 done right.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2012
    • (edited Apr 27th 2012)

    For the convenience of anyone following this here, here is a lightning summary:

    We are in the context of the \infty-topos H\mathbf{H} over some site of formal duals of algebras. So we have a canonical \infty-presheaf ModMod which sends an algebra to its collection of modules, and we consider topologies such that this is an \infty-sheaf. And similarly there is a PerfModPerf \hookrightarrow Mod of nice objects.

    The key conceptual step considered is then on p. 37: PerfPerf is regarded now as a dualizing object between H\mathbf{H} and the \infty-category of suitable monoidal \infty-categories:

    homming any \infty-sheaf XX into PerfPerf gives the tensor \infty-category of nice “\infty-vector bundles over XX”, and dually.

    (Reading the ModMod and PerfPerf as categorifications of sheaves of functions, this a categorified 𝒪Spec\mathcal{O} \dashv Spec-adjunction: from a space we form its 2-ring of 2-functions and from a 2-ring we form the space that is its 2-spectrum).

    The question now is: restricted to which spaces XHX \in \mathbf{H} does this duality constutute an equivalence?

    The answer of theorem 7.14 is: at least for those XX which are group objects represented in a nice way by group objects in the site.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2012

    The Adelaide link gives me a badly formatting copy of the thesis. Any idea why?

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2012
    • (edited Apr 27th 2012)

    Do you mean http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/69436/1/02whole.pdf? That works well for me.

    By the way (seeing the title page of the thesis again), a) I didn’t know that Varghese Mathai is looking into such matters and b) that it an impressive thesis jury!

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2012

    Mathai isn’t into higher category theory, he was just James’ supervisor to start with, and at some point suggested he look into Tannaka theory when approaching geometric Langlands. Things just went from there and James moved to France to work with Toen.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2012
    • (edited Apr 27th 2012)

    When I download the thesis it looks as if it is trying to use fonts that are not available. Strangely it is alright on our other computer! (Edit: redirected my Firefox preferences to open in Adobe Reader and it is fine, but in Preview it failed. Weird!)