Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2012
    • (edited May 25th 2012)

    I have expanded theory adding more basics in classical syntactic approach. I added a new subsection

    Set-theoretic models for a first-order theory in syntactic approach

    The basic concept is of a structure for a first-order language L: a set M together with an interpretation of L in M. A theory is specified by a language and a set of sentences in L. An L-structure M is a model of T if for every sentence ϕ in T, its interpretation in M, ϕM is true (“ϕ holds in M”). We say that T is consistent or satisfiable (relative to the universe in which we do model theory) if there exist at least one model for T (in our universe). Two theories, T1, T2 are said to be equivalent if they have the same models.

    Given a class K of structures for L, there is a theory Th(K) consisting of all sentences in L which hold in every structure from K. Two structures M and N are elementary equivalent (sometimes written by equality M=N, sometimes said “elementarily equivalent”) if Th(M)=Th(N), i.e. if they satisfy the same sentences in L. Any set of sentences which is equivalent to Th(K) is called a set of axioms of K. A theory is said to be finitely axiomatizable if there exist a finite set of axioms for K.

    A theory is said to be complete if it is equivalent to Th(M) for some structure M.