Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: generalized Calabi-Yau manifold

Bottom of Page

1 to 6 of 6

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 27th 2012
    • (edited May 27th 2012)

    stub for generalized Calabi-Yau manifold, (for the moment just to record some references)

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeMay 27th 2012
    • (edited May 27th 2012)

    I do not like the terminology. It is like calling a functor among nn-categories generalized functor, while it is just THE appropriate notion of the functor in that context. On the other hand, there are some generalizations of Calabi-Yau manifolds within usual varieties (or, sometimes, within orbifolds/algebraic stacks) which better deserve the name (as they indeed generalize the notion, within more or less the standard context, rather than transfer it mutatis mutandis to a new context). Kontsevich and Soibelman have one notion like that (which they also call generalized CY manifolds) within smooth compact complex varieties where one requires CY-like behaviour for certain Hodge numbers and some cohomological condition.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 27th 2012

    I don’t even like the whole “generalized”-terminology of generalized complex geometry that this comes from, since it is so very unspecific and so ignorant of all the other sensible generalizatons that there are.

    Unfortunately, however, it has become very much standard terminology. Therefore I’d opt for keeping the entry names this way and maybe add a discussion of terminology problems in the entry.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeMay 27th 2012
    • (edited May 27th 2012)

    Maybe it is standard in some community. The algebraic geometry community, which has the main contributions to the study of Calabi-Yau has other preferences for what is generalized Calabi-Yau; similarly with some other “generalized” notions.

    I consider the terminology “generalized complex geometry” entirely standard (if “complex” is included, absolutely not otherwise), but not assuming that prefixing generalized to any notion in geometry makes it referring toward there. Instead one can postfix the terminology by “in generalized complex geometry” and then it is clear to anybody what is meant (like saying “functor among weak nn-categories”). So why not adopting “Calabi-Yau manifold in generalized complex geometry” ? I mean what will we do when generalized Calabi-Yau of algebraic geometry start more massively appearing on the net ? Ignore and not making an entry, just because a more shallow notion in other field has been introduced ?

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 28th 2012

    I agree, renaming the entry to “Calabi-Yau in generalized complex geometry” might be a good idea. I can do so later (will have to fight the Cache bug once I do, no leisure to do so right now).

    Meanwhile, I have added a note on the definition of “Calabi-Yau in generalized complex geometry” in terms of reduction of the structure group.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2020
    • (edited Dec 18th 2020)

    added pointer to

    for the relation to (non-integrable) G-structure for G=G = SU(n).

    And added cross-link with MSU.

    diff, v7, current

1 to 6 of 6

  1.