Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2012
    • (edited Dec 12th 2012)

    started Brauer group, collecting some references on the statement that/when Br(X)H et 2(X,𝔾 m) torBr(X) \simeq H^2_{et}(X, \mathbb{G}_m)_{tor} and moved notes from a talk by David Gepner on \infty-Brauer groups to there.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2012
    • (edited Jun 15th 2012)

    I added the insightful references of Street at Azumaya algebra and at Brauer group:

    • Ross Street, Descent, Oberwolfach preprint (sec. 6, Brauer groups) pdf; Some combinatorial aspects of descent theory, Applied categorical structures 12 (2004) 537-576, math.CT/0303175 (sec. 12, Brauer groups)
    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 14th 2012

    Thanks. I have changed “Brower group” to “Brauer group”, okay?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 14th 2012

    So I have added a remark in a new section Relation to categories of modules.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJun 15th 2012

    Thanks for Brauer, Urs.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2012

    added to Brauer group references on Brauer groups for superalgebras.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2012

    added Duskin’s historical paper

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2014
    • (edited May 22nd 2014)

    have added to Brauer group a paragraph (here) on its “bigger” version (thanks toDavid C. for the pointer to Heinloth’s article)

    It is therefore natural to regard all of H et 2(R,𝔾 m)H^2_{et}(R, \mathbb{G}_m) as the “actual” Brauer group. This has been called the “bigger Brauer group” (Taylor 82, Caenepeel-Grandjean 98, Heinloth-Schöer 08). the bigger Brauer group has actually traditionally been implicit already in the term “formal Brauer group”, which is really the formal geometry-version of the bigger Brauer group.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2014

    Have added at the references at Brauer group:

    The observation that passing to derived algebraic geometry makes also the non-torsion elements in H et 2(,𝔾 m)H^2_{et}(-,\mathbb{G}_m) be represented by (derived) Azumaya algebras is due to

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2020

    Added the reference:

    diff, v32, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)