Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMatanP
   • CommentTimeJun 20th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: MatanP
   Format: MarkdownItexDo anyone here knows of works that study higher (preferably infinity) versions of dualizing complexes? Thanks in advance..

   Do anyone here knows of works that study higher (preferably infinity) versions of dualizing complexes?

   Thanks in advance..

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat is the application you have in mind ? I am sure nobody done for $(\infty,m)$ for $m\gt 1$, while for most applications $(\infty,1)$ does not buy you much over the traditional derived picture and it is probably kind of worked out (not buying much by theorem of Orlov/Lunts on uniqueness of enhancements in most geometric contexts).

   What is the application you have in mind ? I am sure nobody done for $(\infty,m)$ for $m\gt 1$, while for most applications $(\infty,1)$ does not buy you much over the traditional derived picture and it is probably kind of worked out (not buying much by theorem of Orlov/Lunts on uniqueness of enhancements in most geometric contexts).

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorMatanP
   • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: MatanP
   Format: MarkdownItexWell, I don't have specific application in mind but I have the general feeling that Verdier's theory of derived categories can all be "lifted" from the homotopy category to stable infinity-categories. Of course much have been done in this direction with (stable) model structures on complexes etc., but I was wondering specifically about dualizing complexes because it wasn't clear to me how such a thing will go. Nevertheless, can you name the paper/thm of Orlov/Lunts you had in mind?

   Well, I don’t have specific application in mind but I have the general feeling that Verdier’s theory of derived categories can all be “lifted” from the homotopy category to stable infinity-categories. Of course much have been done in this direction with (stable) model structures on complexes etc., but I was wondering specifically about dualizing complexes because it wasn’t clear to me how such a thing will go. Nevertheless, can you name the paper/thm of Orlov/Lunts you had in mind?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorMatanP
   • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: MatanP
   Format: MarkdownItexLet me try and sharpen the question: suppose for simplicity that we take d.c.'s over a fixed ring. then we get a subinfinity-category of the category C(A Mod) of complexes of A-modules. We can then try and "lift" theorems on dualizing complexes that were traditionally phrased in terms of the homotopy category and get their infinity versions (e.g. by using the different model structures). I would like to know of works that took such a path.

   Let me try and sharpen the question: suppose for simplicity that we take d.c.’s over a fixed ring. then we get a subinfinity-category of the category C(A Mod) of complexes of A-modules. We can then try and “lift” theorems on dualizing complexes that were traditionally phrased in terms of the homotopy category and get their infinity versions (e.g. by using the different model structures). I would like to know of works that took such a path.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJun 23rd 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexUsually similar work is in terms of A-infinity categories, rather than in a bit further simplicial language.

   Usually similar work is in terms of A-infinity categories, rather than in a bit further simplicial language.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorMatanP
   • CommentTimeJun 24th 2012
   • (edited Jun 24th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: MatanP
   Format: MarkdownItexone interesting thing is that although the full sub-infinity-category of all dualizing complexes (over, say, a noetherian ring) is not stable (while the category of complexes is), it is almost stable in that d.c.'s are unique up to a shift and a tensor by an invertible.

   one interesting thing is that although the full sub-infinity-category of all dualizing complexes (over, say, a noetherian ring) is not stable (while the category of complexes is), it is almost stable in that d.c.’s are unique up to a shift and a tensor by an invertible.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 4th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexJust for the record: In [[E-infinity geometry]] higher dualizing complexes are discussed in section 4.2 of Lurie's _[[Representability theorems]]_

   Just for the record:

   In E-infinity geometry higher dualizing complexes are discussed in section 4.2 of Lurie’s Representability theorems

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorMatanP
   • CommentTimeDec 5th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: MatanP
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks!

   Thanks!