Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

Atrium > Mathematics, Physics & Philosophy: Homotopy theory with finite topological spaces

Bottom of Page

1 to 10 of 10

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJul 2nd 2012

    OK, how come nobody told me about this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudocircle

    As explained in the last sentence, every the geometric realisation of any finite simplicial complex is weakly homotopy equivalent to some finite topological space.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMatanP
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2012

    I had the same feeling about this when I first heard it. I believe the problem is that you cannot model the entire mapping space using fixed finite spaces. every map admits a sufficient subdivision that captures it but all together you’d have to have infinite spaces involved. That said, I think the theory of finite spaces is under-appreciated and should have interesting uses in applied algebraic topology.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2012

    I once had a thought of doing directed homotopy theory (∞\infty-categories instead of ∞\infty-groupoids) using non-T 1T_1 spaces (with Sierpiński space as the simplest nontrivial example), but it didn’t go anywhere.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2012

    Perhaps using pro- and/or ind-finite spaces would help with the problem of mapping spaces?

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2012

    Peter May wrote some nice slides and some notes. If you want more look at Jonathan Barmak’s book.

    Raphael Sorkin used (finite) T_0-space in some of his work and I picked up some related ideas in joint work with Gratus and, being me, did explore some of the pro-stuff. (Of course T_0-spaces are just posets, so I think Toby did know about them!)

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorjim_stasheff
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2012
    Speaking of posets, there is also the realization of the poset as a simplicial complex and then the work of Gerstenhaber relating that (co)homology to Hochschild's.
    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorjim_stasheff
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012
    Following up on that thought:
    if you want to read off homology from a cover, the spaces allowed in the cover should have trivial homology themselves. In this case that means just {a}, {b}, {abc}, {abd}. If you view just these four as a poset, the geometric realization of the nerve is indeed a circle.
    I admit this is pretty much ad hoc, but it also shows how you can construct many more "pseudo" objects.
    Murray

    Is this transverse to what others had in mind?

    jim
    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012

    Richard Williamson has some new results in this area and has promised that when he has time he will add some material on them to the lab. They relate to ‘Folk’ model structures and he also mentions the paper: George Raptis, Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol. 12 (2), 2010, 211-230.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2018

    Copied from another thread: on Tables of homotopy groups.

    The paper on minimal finite spaces by Barmak and Minian:

    • Jonathan Barmak and G. Minian, Minimal finite models J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 2 (2007), 127-140. (ArXiv)

    may be of interest.

  10. Funny to see #8, I had completely forgotten about it, but now distantly remember an email conversation in which we discussed this! I should definitely try to put this material up some time!

1 to 10 of 10

  1.