Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeAug 25th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexMade a start on [[modular lattice]].

   Made a start on modular lattice.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeAug 25th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have added a disambiguation line at the top, and created a stub for _[[modular integral lattice]]_. I also created a page _[[lattice (disambiguation)]]_.

   I have added a disambiguation line at the top, and created a stub for modular integral lattice. I also created a page lattice (disambiguation).

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeAug 25th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexI don't see the disambiguation line; did you notice I was editing for the last hour or so?

   I don’t see the disambiguation line; did you notice I was editing for the last hour or so?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeAug 25th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexOh, I see, you added the line to [[lattice]], not [[modular lattice]].

   Oh, I see, you added the line to lattice, not modular lattice.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeAug 25th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have now added a disambiguation line also to _[[modular lattice]]_. (I _thought_ I did this before, but also certainly I did wait for you to unlock the entry. So apparently in the end I forgot to do it after all.)

   I have now added a disambiguation line also to modular lattice. (I thought I did this before, but also certainly I did wait for you to unlock the entry. So apparently in the end I forgot to do it after all.)

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeAug 25th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks! It's amusing to me that we have _two_ pairs of terms to disambiguate in this way (probably equally well entrenched in their respective communities).

   Thanks! It’s amusing to me that we have two pairs of terms to disambiguate in this way (probably equally well entrenched in their respective communities).

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeAug 25th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexYes. Of course most famous is the notion of _[[unimodular lattice]]_. Ever since we have the entry _[[lattice]]_ I keep having the thought that "most" people will not expect the order theoretic notion by default. But then, "most" strongly depends on context, of course.

   Yes. Of course most famous is the notion of unimodular lattice.

   Ever since we have the entry lattice I keep having the thought that “most” people will not expect the order theoretic notion by default. But then, “most” strongly depends on context, of course.

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeAug 25th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItex> Ever since we have the entry lattice I keep having the thought that "most" people will not expect the order theoretic notion by default. That's funny, because in my day-to-day life I think about the order-theoretic notion much more often than about discrete free abelian subgroups of maximal rank. Anyway, I'm glad you constructed the disambiguation page.

   Ever since we have the entry lattice I keep having the thought that “most” people will not expect the order theoretic notion by default.

   That’s funny, because in my day-to-day life I think about the order-theoretic notion much more often than about discrete free abelian subgroups of maximal rank. Anyway, I’m glad you constructed the disambiguation page.

9. • CommentRowNumber9.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeAug 26th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexFlashback: When I was a graduate student at Rutgers, I.M. Gel'fand would, for unfathomable reasons, frequently ask speakers in his seminar if they knew about the free modular lattice on 3 generators, and particularly if they knew how many elements it contained. (Answer: 28.) It seems he was much taken with modular lattices and their linear representations.

   Flashback: When I was a graduate student at Rutgers, I.M. Gel’fand would, for unfathomable reasons, frequently ask speakers in his seminar if they knew about the free modular lattice on 3 generators, and particularly if they knew how many elements it contained. (Answer: 28.) It seems he was much taken with modular lattices and their linear representations.

10. • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 24th 2015
    • PermaLink
    Author: Todd_Trimble
    Format: MarkdownItexI added a snippet to the section on [free modular lattices](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/modular+lattice#free_modular_lattices), mentioning briefly the current Café discussion.

    I added a snippet to the section on free modular lattices, mentioning briefly the current Café discussion.