Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I have polished category of chain complexes a little more and started a section (but unfinished) with discussion of that and how is itself again an abelian category
There seems to be some confusion (including my confusion!) as to the usual notation for ‘bounded above’ chain complexes, etc., on the page category of chain complexes , when I compare the notation with Weibel (and several others). Weibel (page 3) uses for bounded above , for bounded below.
added pointer to:
1 to 6 of 6