Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: long line

Bottom of Page

1 to 10 of 10

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 7th 2012

    I’ve added to the formerly stubby long line.

    Incidentally, I thought the one-point compactification of the long line was called the “long circle”, but I don’t see mention of that via google. What’s that thing called?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 8th 2012

    There’s a question of whether the long circle should be the one point compactification of the long line, or the result of gluing the long ray into a loop. Note that some people like Steen and Seebach use ’long line’ to mean the long ray. I don’t know a reference for ’long circle’, but its use to mean something like this seems fairly obvious.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 8th 2012

    Thanks, Mike. Perhaps one doesn’t see many references because the interest in the long line is that it’s a topological manifold, but the ’long circle’ (under whatever definition) isn’t.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 8th 2012

    While fixing a mistake at long line, I noticed that at the misstated property, Toby had edited to “Tychonoff product”. Is that supposed to be the same as the categorical product for TopTop? If so, I don’t see how the ’Tychonoff’ is really needed.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2012

    It’s only need to link to the correct page. But that page is not there! I will make it.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2012

    Thanks. I guess that means that you thought you had created that page sometime in the past, but hadn’t. I was just puzzled by the idea that while there must be hundreds of places scattered around the nLab where one refers to the product of spaces, somehow long line created a sudden urge to refer to the “Tychonoff product”! :-) But now I see that’s probably not what happened here.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMay 15th 2017

    The usual line (or rather, ray) [0,∞)[0, \infty), as an ordered set, has a nice coalgebraic description: it is the terminal coalgebra for the functor F:Pos→PosF: Pos \to Pos that sends a poset XX to ℕ×X\mathbb{N} \times X endowed with the lexicographic order. (See continued fraction.) Does anyone have an idea what the terminal coalgebra for X↦ω 1×XX \mapsto \omega_1 \times X (the latter with lexicographic order) looks like? I don’t suppose that it’s the long ray. Something like a super-long ray??

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMay 15th 2017

    Musing about my own question, maybe the answer is located in some subfield of the surreal numbers…

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeMay 15th 2017

    Interesting question. It does seem like it ought to be a “long ray” that’s also “locally long” in that it’s isomorphic to its own subintervals [n,n+1)[n,n+1).

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJul 25th 2018

    Added details for the proof that the long line is not contractible.

    diff, v13, current

1 to 10 of 10

  1.