Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2012
   • (edited Sep 22nd 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexThere are several entries involving the word 'dense', which are not linked to each other, e.g., [[dense subspace]] and [[dense functor]]. Is there a way of conveying the notion of density abstractly? Dually, is there anything more to codensity than [[codensity monad]]? Should there be 'density comonad'? Is that odd that the link 'codense' in [[codensity monad]] points to [[dense functor]]?

   There are several entries involving the word ’dense’, which are not linked to each other, e.g., dense subspace and dense functor. Is there a way of conveying the notion of density abstractly?

   Dually, is there anything more to codensity than codensity monad? Should there be ’density comonad’?

   Is that odd that the link ’codense’ in codensity monad points to dense functor?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeSep 23rd 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI think that dense subspace should a priori not be linked to dense functor, like chimpanzee should not be linked to orangutan, though both should be linked from entry monkey. Or maybe better like limits in category theory should not be linked to limits in analysis, though one can make some comparisons. The second question is more interesting, but I am not competent to answer.

   I think that dense subspace should a priori not be linked to dense functor, like chimpanzee should not be linked to orangutan, though both should be linked from entry monkey. Or maybe better like limits in category theory should not be linked to limits in analysis, though one can make some comparisons.

   The second question is more interesting, but I am not competent to answer.