Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality education elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2009
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2009

    I redirected it from model structure on an under category.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2009

    By the way: I keep seeing in the literature overcategory instead of over category . For instance in the article by Hirschhorn linked to at model structure on an over category.

    Are we sure we want to have the entries named over category and so on?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2009

    Well, I like slice category, but I remember putting it over category in the days before redirects to help insure that your links to it would work.

    I have put in redirects for overcategory and the like.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2009

    Oh, really, was it me who started writing "over category"? I forget. Sorry, then! :-)

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeDec 4th 2009

    Now I am interested in the special case of Top with Strom's model structure. Then there are theorems on the connection between Dold fibrations and Hurewicz fibrations, one of them is that every Dold fibration p:E -> B is

       homotopy equivalent over B 
    

    with a Hurewicz fibration p:E' to B. Is this giving some light on the open question as if there is a model category structure on Top where fibrations are Dold fibrations ? Another important thing is that you can verbatim repeat the definition of Hurewitz fibration to get Dold fibration if instead of homotopies you use delayed homotopies (this is a theorem). Is there a way to use delayed homotopies to nontrivially modify the notion of cofibration ?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeDec 4th 2009
    In the case of the under category, a relevant theorem may be Dold's theorem which states that a map whose underlying map is a homotopy equivalence is already a homotopy equivalence under provided its source and target are cofibrations. This is discussed in Kamps-Porter in quite a lot of detail.
    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeDec 7th 2009

    These are still usual cofibrations, and these do not form a model category with Dold fibrations, but maybe there is a good modified choice of cofibrations which woudl be "complementary" with Dold fibrations (maybe silly idea knowing something specific banning this choice, but to me it looks still reasonable).

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthordomenico_fiorenza
    • CommentTimeJan 3rd 2010
    • (edited Jan 3rd 2010)
    modified Idea in over quasi-category. now it should be less evil.
    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 4th 2010

    That reminds me: we should add a discussion about if and how the model structure on an over category models the corresponding over quasi-category. I was about to make the obvious statement, but I'll need to check something first.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2011

    I have somewhat hastily added to model structure on an over category the argument that over a fibrant object this presents the correct over-(,1)(\infty,1)-category.

    However, I have to dash off now and go offline. Will try to look into this again later.

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2011

    have now found a few minutes to expand and polish the proof

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeDec 21st 2016

    I added a new section https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/model+structure+on+an+over+category#quillen_adjunctions_between_slice_categories about Quillen adjunctions between slice categories.

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 18th 2017

    Hm, the entry slice model structure states that slicing preserves cofibrant generation, properness, combinatoriality, but then what it means to use is preservation of simplicial model structure…

    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeJul 7th 2017

    Re #14: I added Proposition 2.3, which shows that if C is a simplicial model category, then so is C/X.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)