Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2012

    I’m putting this in Preprints & Publications because my initial plan now is to take a good look at Robin Cockett and Geoff Cruttwell’s paper Differential structure, tangent structure, and SDG. It might develop into something else. It’s not well-formed yet, hence nForum rather than nLab as yet. If I get anywhere, I’ll send Geoff an email pointing him to this. As a focussing point, I’ll see if I can figure out how the kinematic tangent space fits in with the axiomatic situation.

    Geoff said on the nCafé that it was the vertical lift (and universality of thus) which, they found, was the key property of tangent structure. So that’s obviously something to pay particular attention to.

    (Note In the paper maps are written on the right. Took me a while to spot that.)

    I’ll repeat the definition. A tangent structure on a category XX consists of a functor T:XXT \colon X \to X and natural transformations (p,0,+,l,c)(p,0,+,l,c) with p:TIdp \colon T \to Id, 0:IdT0 \colon Id \to T, +:T 2T+ \colon T_2 \to T, l:TT 2l \colon T \to T^2, c:T 2T 2c \colon T^2 \to T^2 (here, T 2T_2 is the pullback of pp over itself - extremely minor typo in the paper on this). These satisfy:

    1. additivity (p,0,+)(p,0,+) makes TMT M into an additive bundle over MM. Note that “bundle over” is used simply to mean “object over”, there is none of the baggage that comes in from, say, bundle theory in differential topology.

    2. preservation of pullbacks T nT^n preserves T kT_k

    3. vertical lift (l,0)(l,0) is a natural transformation of additive bundles p:TIdp \colon T \to Id to Tp:T 2TT p \colon T^2 \to T.

    4. switcheroo cc is a natural transformation of additive bundles p T:T 2Tp_T \colon T^2 \to T to Tp:T 2TT p \colon T^2 \to T.

    5. various coherences including c 2=1c^2 = 1 and lc=ll c = l

    6. universality of vertical lift define v:T 2T 2v \colon T_2 \to T^2 by v=(π 1l,π 20 T)T(+)v = (\pi_1 l, \pi_2 0_T) T(+). Then vv is the equaliser of T(p),T(p)p0:T 2TT(p), T(p) p 0 \colon T^2 \to T.

    Right, so now I’ll go away and stare at these definitions for a bit (and wonder why \xrightarrow isn’t working on the forum).