Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeNov 10th 2012
   • (edited Nov 10th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexJust a stub [[superdeterminant]], aka [[Berezinian]]. Added a reference to [[quasideterminant]] and [[universal localization]]. Extended the list of related entries at [[matrix]].

   Just a stub superdeterminant, aka Berezinian. Added a reference to quasideterminant and universal localization. Extended the list of related entries at matrix.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 10th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks. Added some stuff to _[[superdeterminant]]_ (still no real content though).

   Thanks. Added some stuff to superdeterminant (still no real content though).

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeNov 10th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: TextThanks for ftoc. Are you against using word supermathematics (as opposed to long description super-algebra and super-geometry) ?

   Thanks for ftoc. Are you against using word supermathematics (as opposed to long description super-algebra and super-geometry) ?
4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 12th 2012
   • (edited Nov 12th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex> Are you against using word supermathematics (as opposed to long description super-algebra and super-geometry) ? I am not against it. But mathematics is more than algebra and geometry; and presently the toc is only about algebra and geometry in the super context. I find this is an important distinction that standard texts don't usually make explicit: before we come to super-algebra and super-geometry, there are already super-sets, [[super infinity-groupoids]], etc; and then super-algebra/geometry is algebra/geometry _internal_ to such a super topos. What is often highlighted is that super-algebra over a field can be understood as algebra internal to the non-trivially braided symmetric monoidal category of vector spaces. But the internalization-perspective on super-mathematics really goes much deeper. Therefore I would reserve a floating toc [[supermathematics]] for something more general.

   Are you against using word supermathematics (as opposed to long description super-algebra and super-geometry) ?

   I am not against it. But mathematics is more than algebra and geometry; and presently the toc is only about algebra and geometry in the super context.

   I find this is an important distinction that standard texts don’t usually make explicit: before we come to super-algebra and super-geometry, there are already super-sets, super infinity-groupoids, etc; and then super-algebra/geometry is algebra/geometry internal to such a super topos.

   What is often highlighted is that super-algebra over a field can be understood as algebra internal to the non-trivially braided symmetric monoidal category of vector spaces. But the internalization-perspective on super-mathematics really goes much deeper.

   Therefore I would reserve a floating toc supermathematics for something more general.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJan 21st 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI have listed several well known references at [[superdeterminant]].

   I have listed several well known references at superdeterminant.