Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 24th 2013

    stub for virtual particle, just for completeness

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJan 25th 2013
    • (edited Jan 25th 2013)

    Do you really take that this belongs to the context of “measure and probability theory” (I know it can if stretched, bit then so much can…) as the ftoc witnesses ? I am a bit puzzled.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 25th 2013

    Would you have the same question about Feynman diagram?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJan 26th 2013


    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJan 27th 2013

    I'm inclined to say that if it fits into measure and probability theory for you, then you may as well include that Context. That said, I am surprised that it fits in (same with Feynman diagram); and now that I've looked, I'm also surprised to see thermodynamics listed under that heading (although there the connection seems closer).

    So I don't expect you to explain the connection to justify including that Context. But I'm still interested to hear why you did it.