Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 4th 2013

    I had started to expand Eilenberg-Watts theorem a little. Stated it in more modern form as an equivalence of categories. Also started adding pointers to Hoyes homotopy-theoretical versions, but then I ran out of steam for the moment. I should come back to this later.

    Is there more than Hovey’s article on the higher-algebra/homotopy-theoretic versions?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 4th 2013
    • (edited Feb 4th 2013)

    I see that the first half of Eilenberg-Watts in \infty-category theory is in Higher Algebra cor. 4.3.5.15 (now recorded in the entry here).

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the second half/converse statement is also hidden there somewhere, but so far I don’t see it…

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)