Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 7th 2013
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeApr 17th 2019

    Added

    Lukas Brantner, Akhil Mathew, Deformation Theory and Partition Lie Algebras, arXiv:1904.07352

    diff, v12, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeNov 5th 2019
    There's a problem in Definition 1.1.

    FMPs are not required to preserve all pull-backs between small objects, but onty pull-backs along small morphisms.
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 6th 2019

    Thanks for the alert.

    I have briefly added the missing clause now.

    But the entry remains a stub, waiting for somebody to expand on it.

    diff, v14, current

  1. Adds a brief elaboration on interpreting the infinitesmally-cartesian condition in obstruction theory.

    Jake Bian

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2022
    Would it make sense to add some comments about extensions of the FMP <-> Lie-alg equivalence?
    For instance:
    - there is Benjamin Hennion's work that extend the Pridham-Lurie theorem over a cdga (rather than just a field).
    - there is Joost Nuiten's work on the equivalence between Lie algebroids and formal thickenings of a derived affine scheme (this encompasses Hennion's work mentioned above).
    - there is Lurie's work (already in DAG X) about E_n-FMPs.
    - there is my work with Campos and Nuiten that generalizes the equivalence to the case of a pair of Koszul dual operads (the theorem of Lurie and Pridham corresponds to the (Com,Lie) duality).

    Finally, there is a nice reference on FMP, that is Toën's Bourbaki seminar: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01253022v2

    Damien (Calaque)
    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2022

    Would it make sense

    Certainly!

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)