Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013
    • (edited Mar 14th 2013)

    Lately when I google for nLab entries, frequently Google’s result list has the entries labeled as “by Timothy Porter”, with a picture of Tim next to it.

    For instance this happens for the search result Google: “nLab model structure for L-infinity algebras” and many others.

    What’s going on?

    I’d suggest that if Google is now trying to figure out who wrote which nLab entry, we should try to provide it somehow, if possible, with a joint Bourbakian kind of nnLab identity. It gets a bit misleading otherwise.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013

    Yeah, I really hate that too.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013

    That’s a bit annoying. I guess that the snapshot that google took was when Tim’s name appeared at the bottom. But even so, from what I’ve read then it shouldn’t have associated it with him.

    From a brief search, I can’t see how to associate a generic author in this way. Might be work a question to google about it.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013
    • (edited Mar 14th 2013)

    Perhaps they update once a month and I made a typo correction on March 1st! (Strangely I do not get the same thing happening here. ??? Seeing my photo… do you mean from Google+?)

    Todd said:I really hate that too. So do I!

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013

    (Strangely I do not get the same thing happening here. ??? Seeing my photo… do you mean from Google+?)

    I suppose it's your G+ photo. It appears all over the place these days when one googles around the nLab! :-)

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013

    I should say: it's not a big deal, there are more important things to worry about, it just adds one more abstrusity to a world already rich in abstrusities. I was just wondering what's going on and if this is something that has been caused intentionally somewhere or if it is just Google loosing it. If it isn't Tim who blackmailed them to attach his photo all over the place, then I guess all we can do is hope for them to fix their "social search" thing, or whatever it's called.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013

    Is it this Google signup for authorship that causes this?

    I suppose you signed up there, at some point? Tim?

    If that’s what it is, I suppose then what one could do/would have to do is create a G+ account “nLab” and then have the nLab “signup for authorship”. Since the word “nLab” appears on each nLab page, maybe that would make the Google bot label all entries with “by nLab”.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013
    • (edited Mar 14th 2013)

    Creating a G+ account for the n-Lab may be a good idea for other purposes as well, but may have its downside if people think they should leave messages there for the active n-Labbers rather than on the Forum.

    I have not signed up for that to my knowledge!

    I did add contributer to the n-Lab. Out of interest I have now deleted that, so see if the dreaded picture disappears!!! I cannot check ot myself as I never had that phenomenon occur on my machine.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013

    Thanks for the information, Tim. I am feeling bad about making you feel bad about this…

    By the way, is there a way that I can tell my Google search page to entirely switch off all that social nonsense? There are more such things that annoy me. All those +1s and shares and whatnot besides search result. Is there a way that I just tell Google not to show this to me? Does anyone know?

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013
    • (edited Mar 14th 2013)

    At least one can undo miggling address

    http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/copy-crapfree-urls-googles-search-results

    I am very glad I have decrapified my firefox.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013

    @Urs. Don’t worry. I’m not feeling bad, slightly intrigued that is all. :-)

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2013
    • (edited Mar 14th 2013)

    Urs - try http://sproutsocial.com/insights/2012/01/disable-google-social-search/

    And thanks, Zoran. That’s really helpful.

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMar 19th 2013

    It looks like you don't exactly sign up for this Google Authorship thing. There are a list of conditions that, if satisfied, will cause Google to identify you as an author, and these conditions could be satisfied by accident. In particular, Google seems to have an @ncatlab.org email address for Tim; do those exist? And then we should be able to disable this by not having the phrase ‘by Tim Porter’. (We actually have ‘Last edited by Tim Porter.’, but Google doesn't seem to know how to interpret that in context.)

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMar 19th 2013

    This is mystifying! On Google+ I give my usual e-mail @bangor.ac.uk. I have a Gmail address but have never activated it.

    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMar 19th 2013

    Toby, you say “Google seems to have an@ncatlab.org email address for Tim”. How did you find that nugget of information?

    There are no ncatlab.org email addresses, by the way, which is why I’d discounted that as a possible route for authorship. But if Google thinks that there are then you’re right, that could be enough.

    What would be nice would be if there were some way to override Google’s ad hoc authorship method with, say, a meta tag. But I’ve yet to find a hint that this is possible.

    • CommentRowNumber16.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2013

    How did you find that nugget of information?

    It's my interpretation of #5 at the link that Urs found. Without Google thinking that Tim has an @ncatlab.org address (or @mathforge.org maybe?), that item wouldn't be satisfied, so the process shouldn't work. But somehow it worked!

    • CommentRowNumber17.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2013

    On advice from someone on Google+ I have changed the CSS class of the “revised by” bit from byline to revisedby. This will make no alteration to the page as it is just a CSS class name.

    \begin{rant}

    Why Google has decided to use a CSS class name is beyond me. It’s back to the Bad Old Days of non-standard HTML where each browser had its own set of special tags and page authors had to hack the pages together using a variety of “If this browser then do that” methods. CSS class names can be anything that the page author wants and don’t have to mean anything. They are simply to identify an element in the page for CSS or Javascript.

    \end{rant}

    Unfortunately, byline is baked into the cached entries so either I have to clear the entire cache or we accept that this will only fix things gradually as stuff gets edited – assuming that it does fix things, this is an experiment after all.

    • CommentRowNumber18.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2013

    Back in the day, I used to clear the entire cache once in a while (when the cache bug got overwhelming), and it didn't seem to slow things down.