Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Looking at the list there at twisted cohomology is the word ‘getsted’???? does anyone remember what the word was meant to be?!
I believe Jim Stasheff wrote that. Maybe he meant “guessed”? I don’t know. Maybe he sees this here.
Added:
Homology with local coefficients was introduced in
An independent account appeared in
The paper
shows that twisted Eilenberg–MacLane spaces classify cohomology with local coefficients.
We also have an entry twisted ordinary cohomology. This already listed Steenrod’s and Gitler’s articles. I am copying Reidemeister’s article to there, and am adding the cross-link between the two entries more prominently.
By the way, for the classification of twisted ordinary cohomology by fibrations of EM-spaces I am usually pointing to these three articles (from twisted ordinary cohomology – References), which make it rather transparent:
Yasumasa Hirashima, A note on cohomology with local coefficients, Osaka J. Math., Volume 16, Number 1 (1979), 219-231 &lbrackeuclid:ojm/1200771839]
Paul Goerss, J. F. Jardine, p. 332 of: Simplicial homotopy theory, Progress in Mathematics, Birkhäuser (1999) Modern Birkhäuser Classics (2009) [doi:10.1007/978-3-0346-0189-4]
M. Bullejos, E. Faro, M. A. García-Muñoz, Homotopy colimits and cohomology with local coefficients, Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques, 44 no. 1 (2003), p. 63-80 [numdam:CTGDC_2003__44_1_63_0]
1 to 5 of 5