Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdownadded to [[(infinity,1)-operad]] the definition/proposition of the model structure for the category of (oo,1)-categories of operations <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/(infinity%2C1)-operad#ModelForinfOpera">here</a>

   added to (infinity,1)-operad the definition/proposition of the model structure for the category of (oo,1)-categories of operations here

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownThe table of contents seemed mixed up there, so I tried to fix it.

   The table of contents seemed mixed up there, so I tried to fix it.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
   • (edited Dec 11th 2009)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdownadded a section - <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/(infinity%2C1)-operad#relation">Relation between the two definitions</a> at [[(infinity,1)-operad]] where I give some definition/proposition/proof, as far as I think I can see, of aspects of what is expected to be a Quillen equivalence between the Cisinski-Moerdijk-Weiss-model and the Lurie-model of (oo,1)-operads.

   added a section

   • Relation between the two definitions

   at (infinity,1)-operad where I give some definition/proposition/proof, as far as I think I can see, of aspects of what is expected to be a Quillen equivalence between the Cisinski-Moerdijk-Weiss-model and the Lurie-model of (oo,1)-operads.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownIn that context I added to [[spine]] the definition for [[dendroidal set]]s.

   In that context I added to spine the definition for dendroidal sets.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
   • (edited Dec 11th 2009)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownI further strengthened the statement (and proof) of the theorem about the <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/(infinity%2C1)-operad#relation">Relation between the two definitions</a> at [[(infinity,1)-operad]]. Now I have _almost_ that the dendroidal nerve from the Lurie-model to the Cisinski-Moerdijk-Weiss model is the right adjoint of a Quillen adjunction, _except_ that I currently only know that the left adjoint has the required respect for acylic cofibrations only for cofibrant domains. I'll think about getting rid of that condition...

   I further strengthened the statement (and proof) of the theorem about the Relation between the two definitions at (infinity,1)-operad.

   Now I have almost that the dendroidal nerve from the Lurie-model to the Cisinski-Moerdijk-Weiss model is the right adjoint of a Quillen adjunction, except that I currently only know that the left adjoint has the required respect for acylic cofibrations only for cofibrant domains. I'll think about getting rid of that condition...

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdownahm, or maybe not. There is a gap in my argument. I have briefly indicated this in the proof for the moment, but need to leave it at that for the time being, as I have to go offline now. More later.

   ahm, or maybe not. There is a gap in my argument. I have briefly indicated this in the proof for the moment, but need to leave it at that for the time being, as I have to go offline now. More later.