Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2013
    • (edited Jun 27th 2013)

    For some reason (related to idle wondering about a tangent category to a tangent category), I looked at Romie Banerjee’s ’Categories of modules and their deformations’ (arxiv). It has

    Definition 4.1. ([6]) An ∞-prestack F has an obstruction theory if (i) F is infinitesimally cohesive (ii) F has a cotangent complex

    So I was interested to see the uptake of Urs’ ’infinitesimal cohesion’, but [6] points to Toen and Vezzosi’s Homotopical Algebraic Geometry II (arxiv). I guess the reference is to their definition 1.4.2.1

    (2) A stack F has an obstruction theory (relative to (C, C0,A)) if it has a (global) cotangent complex and if it is infinitesimally cartesian (relative to (C, C0,A)).

    Is Banerjee suggesting then that infinitesimally cartesian and infinitesimally cohesive are the same? But the latter applies to -toposes not stacks. Strange, n’est-ce pas?

    (EDIT: Oh, I see other people are using it differently, e.g., Lurie in DAG-XIV, Definition 2.1.9. Disambiguation needed?)

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2013
    • (edited Jun 27th 2013)

    Hi, thanks for pointing this out, I had missed that.

    I have added a brief entry cohesive infinity-prestack and disambiguated at cohesive (infinity,1)-topos.