Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 12th 2013

    Added to Hopf monad the Bruguières-Lack-Virelizier definition and some properties.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 12th 2013

    Now added also the Mesablishvili-Wisbauer definition. There is a relationship between the two definitions described in the Mesablishvili-Wisbauer paper, but I can’t really figure it out.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 26th 2023

    Hopf (bi)monads are extensively studied in the book

    • Gabriella Böhm, Hopf algebras and their generalizations from a category theoretical point of view, Lecture Notes in Math. 2226, Springer 2018, doi

    diff, v14, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 26th 2023

    Somehow doi does not work directly but from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-98137-6

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeMay 29th 2023

    Added a reference to Frobenius monads.

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeMay 29th 2023

    I’m not sure it’s appropriate to redirect bimonad here, rather than having a disambiguation page, since other concepts (like Frobenius monads) could also be argued to deserve that name.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 20th 2023

    added pointer to:

    • Masahito Hasegawa and Jean-Simon Pacaud Lemay, Hopf Monads on Biproducts, Theory and Applications of Categories 39 28 (2023) 804-823 [tac:3928]

    diff, v16, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorperezl.alonso
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2024

    Given an exact sequence of (finite-dim’l semisimple) Hopf algebras AH˜HA\to \tilde{H}\to H, one has an exact sequence of fusion categories Comod(A)Comod(H˜)Comod(H)\text{Comod}(A) \to \text{Comod} (\tilde{H}) \to \text{Comod} (H). Such exact sequences are classified by a Hopf monad on, in this case, Comod(H)\text{Comod} (H), which here is just the composition T=ResIndT=\text{Res} \circ \text{Ind} of the Induction functor Ind\text{Ind} followed by the Restriction functor Res\text{Res} of comodules. In this case this is actually a Frobenius monad, as it has compatible lax and oplax structure. On the other hand, an exact sequence of Hopf algebras is determined by a weak action HAAH\otimes A\to A, a cocycle HHAH\otimes H\to A, a weak coaction HHAH\to H\otimes A, and a dual cocycle HAAH\to A\otimes A, satisfying some array of conditions.

    My question is, is there a straightforward way to state how these four ingredients construct the Frobenius monad T=ResIndT=\text{Res} \circ \text{Ind} ? Or equivalently how starting from such a monad one can distil the weak (co)actions and (dual) cocycle?