Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Added to Hopf monad the Bruguières-Lack-Virelizier definition and some properties.
Now added also the Mesablishvili-Wisbauer definition. There is a relationship between the two definitions described in the Mesablishvili-Wisbauer paper, but I can’t really figure it out.
Hopf (bi)monads are extensively studied in the book
Somehow doi does not work directly but from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-98137-6
I’m not sure it’s appropriate to redirect bimonad here, rather than having a disambiguation page, since other concepts (like Frobenius monads) could also be argued to deserve that name.
Given an exact sequence of (finite-dim’l semisimple) Hopf algebras , one has an exact sequence of fusion categories . Such exact sequences are classified by a Hopf monad on, in this case, , which here is just the composition of the Induction functor followed by the Restriction functor of comodules. In this case this is actually a Frobenius monad, as it has compatible lax and oplax structure. On the other hand, an exact sequence of Hopf algebras is determined by a weak action , a cocycle , a weak coaction , and a dual cocycle , satisfying some array of conditions.
My question is, is there a straightforward way to state how these four ingredients construct the Frobenius monad ? Or equivalently how starting from such a monad one can distil the weak (co)actions and (dual) cocycle?
1 to 8 of 8