Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
fixed the strange reference which may not work
to
Is there any nLab standard syntax for referencing TAC articles?
Is there any nLab standard syntax for referencing TAC articles?
I am formatting as you just did, with one slight exception: Following early suggestions by Zoran, I have adopted the habit of always displaying the code numbers that go with a webpage where a reference is hosted:
So in this case I would end the item with
([tac:28-26](http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/28/26/28-26abs.html))
rendering to
Similarly for “doi:xyz” or “jstor:xyz” or “arXiv:xyz” or “ISBN:xyz”, etc.
Another minor thing is that I put the anchor labels right to the beginning of the paragraph that they are anchoring, instead of the end. This to avoid that the parser gets mixed up about where the anchor goes, which was a problem at least at some point.
And finally, I include the publication year in the anchor for a reference. This is to facilitate copy-and-pasting references across pages without their anchors clashing too much.
So in summary, I would code that reference as follows:
* {#Weber13} [[Mark Weber]], *Multitensors and monads on categories of enriched graphs*, [[TAC]] 28(26), 2013, ([tac:28-26](http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/28/26/28-26abs.html))
added pointer to:
added pointer to:
adding the category of pointed sets to the list of examples in the “Various” section
Amy Reed
On the other hand, I don’t understand why there are parentheses in the domains of the two canonical morphisms. Isn’t it more natural to consider the tensor product prioritary over the coproduct than the opposite convention given that the coproduct is often considered as a sum? This is the convention adopted in the entry distributive category.
It seems that the first person who wrote the page was considering the coproduct to be prioritary.
1 to 12 of 12