Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I have splitt off from classifying topos an entry classifying topos for the theory of objects and added the statement about the relation to finitary monads.
I added to your remark a related point of view, and linked to some notes of mine.
Ah, thanks, that’s nice!!
We should add some kind of remark concerning also as an Example at monoidal topos. And I guess we should still add a pointer to an explanation of to the entry. I can’t right now, though, am in a rush here…
Nice page, thanks.
I have added a stub for permutation category, just for completeness. In the course of this I noticed that we already have braid category! I have now cross-linked that a bit more such as to make it easier to find.
added also at classifying topos for the theory of objects remarks on the -case:
Similarly
is the classifying topos for pointed objects.
write for the full sub-(∞,1)-category on ∞Grpd which is generated under finite (∞,1)-colimits from the point (HA, def. 1.4.2.8), then the (∞,1)-presheaf (∞,1)-topos is the classifying (∞,1)-topos for objects;
write for pointed finite -groupoids in this sense, then is the classifying -topos for pointed objects. See also at spectrum object via excisive functors.
Fixed some typos and highlighted (hopefully in a correct way) the role of the category of elements in this. It would be nice if one could bring the description of the generic object in section 2 notationally and conceptually in line with the description given in the current section 3 ! Thanks anyway for polishing the entries on ’geometric’ logics and adding clarifications !
Linked to the page finite set in the comments about what finite sets are meant for .
1 to 11 of 11