Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeOct 16th 2013
   • (edited Oct 16th 2013)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexI notice that in W. G. Dwyer and D. M. Kan, Singular functors and realization functors , Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math., 87, (1984), 147 – 153, they look at a generalised version of a an orbit category in a simplicial model category, M. This gives an equivalence between a new (finer) model category structure on M and the projective structure on the simplicial presheaves on the generalised orbit category. Some of their detail is 'lacking' and I am wondering what the current best approach to this is (as the paper is nearly 30 years old). This does seem very relevant for the recent discussions on global homotopy theory, but is more general it seems. It also plays a role in the Dwyer-Kan-Smith paper on obstructions to rectifying/rigidifying homotopy commutative diagrams. Do we have anything on that construction of Dwyer and Kan in the Lab? I could not find it in any of the obvious places.

   I notice that in W. G. Dwyer and D. M. Kan, Singular functors and realization functors , Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math., 87, (1984), 147 – 153, they look at a generalised version of a an orbit category in a simplicial model category, M. This gives an equivalence between a new (finer) model category structure on M and the projective structure on the simplicial presheaves on the generalised orbit category. Some of their detail is ’lacking’ and I am wondering what the current best approach to this is (as the paper is nearly 30 years old). This does seem very relevant for the recent discussions on global homotopy theory, but is more general it seems. It also plays a role in the Dwyer-Kan-Smith paper on obstructions to rectifying/rigidifying homotopy commutative diagrams.

   Do we have anything on that construction of Dwyer and Kan in the Lab? I could not find it in any of the obvious places.