Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2013

    started something at twistor space

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 31st 2013
    • (edited Oct 31st 2013)

    added a section twistors for 4d Minkowski spacetime with basics on the actual original definition and motivation for twistors.

    (from looking around I gather this is now the only discussion on the web that comes out right away with admitting what a twistor actually is, conceptually :)

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2016

    added an actual section twistor space with discussion of how 𝕂P 3\mathbb{K}P^3 encodes light-like geodesics in Minkowski spacetime. Did this in the generality that 𝕂{,,}\mathbb{K} \in \{\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{C}, \mathbb{H}\}, hence for Minkowski spacetime of total dimensions 3,4, and 6, in order to amplify the algebraic pattern.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2016

    To discuss twistor space for Minkowski spacetime, it is useful to work more generally with dd-dimensional Minkowski spacetime for d{3,4,6,8}d \in \{3,4,6,8\}.

    Do you mean 10 rather than 8?

    Then

    …vectors in Minkowski spacetime in d={2,3,4,10}d = \{2,3,4,10\}

    why those dimensions?

    For d=10d = 10 there is no elegant statement like this, due to the non-associativity of the octonions

    There’s plenty of discussion about why there can’t be an 𝕆P 3\mathbb{O} P^3 here. Enough associativity for 𝕆P 2\mathbb{O} P^2, but not projective space. Does the lack of octonion spinors tell us anything, or is it just an inconvenience?

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2016
    • (edited Oct 18th 2016)

    Sorry for the silly typos, fixed now. Thanks for catching them. I’ll try to catch the next train home to get some sleep.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2018

    Corrected a subscript.

    diff, v36, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTime1 day ago

    Added monographs

    • L. J. Mason, N. M. J. Woodhouse, Integrability, self-duality and twistor theory, Oxford Univ. Press 1996
    • R. S. Ward, R. O. Wells, Jr. Twistor geometry and field theory, Cambridge Univ. Press 1990

    diff, v37, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTime1 day ago

    Added also two references on palatial twistor theory, a new hope of Penrose, related to quantization.

    diff, v37, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTime1 day ago

    Added also two references on palatial twistor theory, a new hope of Penrose, related to quantization.

    diff, v37, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)