Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeNov 17th 2013
   • (edited Nov 17th 2013)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexI noted an entry on [[generalized Eilenberg-MacLane space]]s, but note that there is another use of this term in the literature, namely the representing fibrations for cohomology with local coefficients. These are the fibrations used by Gitler and then by Alan Robinson, Hans Baues and others more recently. What would be the preferred name for these latter things. (I personally find the idea of giving a name to products of Eilenberg- Mac Lane spaces other that `products of Eilenberg - Mac Lane spaces' a bit strange, but I know that there is some strange terminology around!)

   I noted an entry on generalized Eilenberg-MacLane spaces, but note that there is another use of this term in the literature, namely the representing fibrations for cohomology with local coefficients. These are the fibrations used by Gitler and then by Alan Robinson, Hans Baues and others more recently. What would be the preferred name for these latter things. (I personally find the idea of giving a name to products of Eilenberg- Mac Lane spaces other that ‘products of Eilenberg - Mac Lane spaces’ a bit strange, but I know that there is some strange terminology around!)

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 17th 2013
   • (edited Nov 17th 2013)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexYou should add a disambigation statement then and the other definition. The terminology as I gave it there is standard.

   You should add a disambigation statement then and the other definition. The terminology as I gave it there is standard.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeNov 18th 2013
   • (edited Nov 18th 2013)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItex>The terminology as I gave it there is standard. ... so is the other, if less used! I suggest that we use [[twisted Eilenberg - Mac Lane space]], as that is probably a better term for the second use and has been used e.g. in a paper by Moller (1968). I will go ahead and create a stub for that and link with disambiguation. (There is a description at [[twisted cohomology]], so I have not duplicated that, just linked.)

   The terminology as I gave it there is standard.

   … so is the other, if less used!

   I suggest that we use twisted Eilenberg - Mac Lane space, as that is probably a better term for the second use and has been used e.g. in a paper by Moller (1968). I will go ahead and create a stub for that and link with disambiguation. (There is a description at twisted cohomology, so I have not duplicated that, just linked.)