Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 8th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexRenamed the page [[Spec]] to [[Spectrum]].

   Renamed the page Spec to Spectrum.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeJan 8th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat's the precise idea of where the two senses of spectrum meet, that the spectrum of the sphere spectrum has Morava-K theories as points ([arXiv:1401.1044](http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1044), p. 10)?

   What’s the precise idea of where the two senses of spectrum meet, that the spectrum of the sphere spectrum has Morava-K theories as points (arXiv:1401.1044, p. 10)?

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 16th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have added the statement that in $Spectra$ homotopy cartesian squares are equivalently homotopy cocartesian, with some remarks and pointers. Also re-organized slightly and added cross-link with _[[stable homotopy category]]_. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Spectrum/7">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Spectrum/7">v7</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Spectrum">current</a>

   I have added the statement that in $Spectra$ homotopy cartesian squares are equivalently homotopy cocartesian, with some remarks and pointers.

   Also re-organized slightly and added cross-link with stable homotopy category.

   diff, v7, current

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 16th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexAh, now I see why this page was so empty: There is also _[[stable (infinity,1)-category of spectra]]_ and the two should probably be merged.

   Ah, now I see why this page was so empty: There is also stable (infinity,1)-category of spectra and the two should probably be merged.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 16th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexHm, it may be tedious to merge these entries in a satisfactory way. Maybe instead I'll give the section on finite homotopy (co)limits of spectra its own stand-alone entry, for ease of `!include`-ing it into relevant entries (such as these two, but also _[[stable homotopy category]]_ etc.).

   Hm, it may be tedious to merge these entries in a satisfactory way. Maybe instead I’ll give the section on finite homotopy (co)limits of spectra its own stand-alone entry, for ease of !include-ing it into relevant entries (such as these two, but also stable homotopy category etc.).