Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: Dedekind cut

Bottom of Page

1 to 7 of 7

  1.  

  1. Added to Dedekind cut a short remark on the ¬¬\neg\neg-stability of membership in the lower resp. the upper set of a Dedekind cut.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJan 27th 2014

    Interesting! I didn't quite follow the last bit of your argument, so I rephrased it. (I also regularized the notation of RR vs UU and finagled a link to stable property.)

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorIngoBlechschmidt
    • CommentTimeJan 27th 2014
    • (edited Jan 27th 2014)

    Thanks for catching the typo and streamlining the argument! (For the record, my reasoning was as follows: Since b∈Ub \in U, we have ¬¬(b∈U)\neg\neg(b \in U). Since ¬¬(b∈L)\neg\neg(b \in L) and ¬¬\neg\neg distributes over ∧\wedge, we have ¬¬(b∈L∧b∈R)\neg\neg(b \in L \wedge b \in R). Since b∈L∧b∈R⇒⊥b \in L \wedge b \in R \Rightarrow \bot and ¬¬\neg\neg is monotone, we have ¬¬⊥\neg\neg\bot, so ⊥\bot.)

    The almost-¬¬\neg\neg-stability can be helpful when proving the equivalence of Dedekind cuts with multi-valued Cauchy “sequences” (i.e. certain maps ℚ +→P(ℚ)\mathbb{Q}^+ \to P(\mathbb{Q})). Depending on one’s line of thought, of course, one can otherwise get stuck when trying to show that equivalent multi-valued Cauchy sequences define the same Dedekind cut.

  4. Added a short remark that equality of Dedekind cuts is ¬¬\neg\neg-stable.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeJul 17th 2018

    Added Project Gutenberg link for Beman’s English translation of Continuity and irrational numbers

    diff, v20, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeApr 14th 2022

    When editing is available again on the nLab, I think it would be a good idea to talk about the definition of Dedekind cuts in terms of σ\sigma-frames Σ\Sigma as the set of open truth values, such as Sierpinski space 𝕊\mathbb{S}, and pairs of open subspaces (L,U):(ℚ→Σ)×(ℚ→Σ)(L, U):(\mathbb{Q} \to \Sigma) \times (\mathbb{Q} \to \Sigma), as is common in predicative constructive mathematics and formal topology.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 21st 2023

    polished up the existing reference items

    and added these pointers:

    diff, v33, current

1 to 7 of 7

  1.