Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: Fell bundles

Bottom of Page

1 to 12 of 12

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthordavidoslive
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2014
    I've created a page for Fell Bundles. It's only really a stub at the moment but I'll get around to expanding it eventually. The nLab POV of Fell bundles looks very different from the classical view but the two views can easily be reconciled (which I guess should form part of the expansion).
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthordavidoslive
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2014
    I should add, it's linked from the Continuous Fields of C*-algebras page at the moment.
    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2014

    Thanks!

    I have added a few more hyperlinks and added the plural redirects. Also added a reference (but maybe not the most canonical one, more should be added)

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorspitters
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2014

    There is a way to treat these as a sheaf of Banach algebras and here. I would need to look a bit for the correct references. We have developed a bit of constructive Banach algebra theory that should be applicable to such bundles.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthordavidoslive
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2014
    Nice one - eventually this entry should definitely consider both perspectives, given the duality of sheaves and bundles. I have tried looking at Fell bundles as sheaves before but for some reason it never seemed quite right. A great excuse to revisit them, I guess.
    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorElkai
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2014
    • (edited Mar 3rd 2014)
    Hi,
    I think the notion of C*-correspondence between C*-algebras (weakening that of C*-homomorphism) gives the right definition of Fell bundles in terms of functor ; but then the functor goes from the groupoid to the (2-)category of C*-algebras (morphisms being C*-correspondences). I am adding a page on this 2-category.
    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorElkai
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2014
    I made a few changes in the definition.
    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorspitters
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2014

    Is there a more categorical description/construction of Hilbert-modules and of C*-correspondences? Why is this the “right” definition?

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorElkai
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2014
    • (edited Mar 4th 2014)

    The 2-category CorrCorr has C *C^*-algebras as objects, C *C^*-correspondences as 1-morphisms, and intertwining unitaries as 2-morphisms. 1-isomorphisms in CorrCorr are exactly Morita equivalences of C *C^*-algebras. Now, a saturated Fell bundle (A g) g∈G(A_g)_{g\in G} (cf. Kumjian’s definition) over a group GG, say, is nothing but an action of GG by Morita equivalences on the C *C^*-algebra A eA_e (every fibre A gA_g is an isomorphism A e→A eA_e \rightarrow A_e in the category Corr). More generally, a non-necessarily saturated Fell bundle over a group is just an action by correspondences on the fibre over the neutral element.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2014
    • (edited Mar 4th 2014)

    Thanks for all this.

    This “C*-correspondence” is modeled on the concept of _Hilbert bimodule_ (generalizing it from left bounded action to more general action, I suppose, there should be a comment on that).

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorspitters
    • CommentTimeApr 9th 2014

    Added a reference to the paper by Mulvey.

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 10th 2014

    11: Thanks. I added the doi link to the reference and completed the author’s name to the form in the original publication.

1 to 12 of 12

  1.