Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I have added to SimpSet a list of a few properties of the internal logic of the 1-topos of simplicial sets.
Nice! Dependent choice holds in any presheaf topos (I added a reference).
It would be nice to have a parallel page for cubical sets.
I can’t see the paper by Fourman and Scedrov, but the statement that dependent choice holds in any presheaf topos needs to be qualified. There is relevant material on this at presentation axiom. The external statement, that for every entire relation on an inhabited set there exists a sequence such that , clearly fails if there are inhabited sets which have no global elements (i.e., if is not [externally] projective). I’m not sure about internal analogues, but insofar as the internal form of the presentation axiom may fail for some presheaf toposes, I’m somewhat skeptical.
In the presence of the external presentation axiom (which holds for all presheaf toposes ), projectivity of is equivalent to DC. If has a terminal object , then is projective (as any representable must be), and this is certainly the case for .
Here is the PDF. In fact, IIRC it should be go both ways. DC holds is iff it holds in one, and hence all, presheaf categories.
The link doesn’t send me to the article. But do you follow my objection? I thought I expressed it pretty clearly.
Sorry, there was a / missing, I editted the link above.
The result in the paper is about the internal version of DC (Kripke-Joyal semantics).
I am probably slow, why should projectivity of 1 be equivalent to DC? I can imagine how it implies it.
The necessity of projectivity of is just as I explained in #3, although I was referring to the external version of DC, which speaks of an actual morphism . But let me have a look at the paper (and thanks). Probably the only qualification needed is a matter of mumbling something about the internal version of DC, but let me have a look.
Edit: Argh, problem is that the article is behind a pay wall, and I don’t have institutional access to it.
Todd, if you google for the title of the article, the fifth hit or so (EUDML) takes you to an online readable version. (Would post the link, but cannot from my phone here.)
Thanks, Urs.
1 to 9 of 9