Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 25th 2014
   • (edited Mar 27th 2014)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexHere is a question, probably for Charles (Rezk), if he sees it. The [[string orientation of tmf]] $M String \to tmf$ refines the un-twisted [[Witten genus]] on manifolds with String-structure. More generally, the Witten genus on a Spin-manifold is twisted by a complex vector bundle ("heterotic string") and is a modular form for "[[String^c 2-group|String^c-structure]]", characterized by $\frac{1}{2}p_1 - c_2 = 0$. In the article * Qingtao Chen, Fei Han, Weiping Zhang, "Generalized Witten Genus and Vanishing Theorems" ([arXiv:1003.2325](http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2325)) this twisted Witten genus on $String^c$-structures is re-considered, and on p.2 an obvious question is mentioned: does the twisted Witten genus also have a "topological" lift to a map of spectra? Now, there is indeed an obious map of spectra $M String^c \longrightarrow tmf$, namely the hocolim over the left half of the diagram $$ \array{ && B String^c \\ & \swarrow && \searrow^{\mathrlap{p}} \\ \ast & \mathrlap{\swArrow_{\sigma^c}} & \downarrow^{\mathrlap{p^\ast(\frac{1}{2}p_1 - c2)}} & \mathrlap{B Spin \times B SU} \\ & \searrow && \swarrow_{\frac{1}{2}p_1 - c_2} \\ && B^3 U(1) \\ && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\rho}} \\ && B GL_1(tmf) \\ && \downarrow \\ && tmf Mod } \,, $$ where $\sigma^c$ denotes the homotopy that exhibits $B String^c$ as the homotopy fiber of $\frac{1}{2}p_1 - c_2$, and where $\rho$ is the twisting map exhibiting the plain string orientation of $tmf$ as in [Ando-Blumberg-Gepner 10](http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3004). My exercise is to check if that map $$ \underset{\to}{\lim} \sigma^c : M String^c \to tmf $$ induces on homotopy groups the twisted Witten genus, correctly. While I am slowly chewing on this, I thought I'd ask if anyone has considered this before. Quite likely this is clear to experts such as Charles. Or rather, possibly the push should be rather along the left half of $$ \array{ && B String^c \simeq B String // SU \\ & \swarrow && \searrow^{\mathrlap{p_{Spin}}} \\ (B SU \simeq \ast//SU )& \mathrlap{\swArrow_{\sigma^c}} & \downarrow^{\mathrlap{p_{Spin}^\ast(\frac{1}{2}p_1)}} & \mathrlap{B Spin } \\ & {}_{\mathllap{c_2}}\searrow && \swarrow_{\frac{1}{2}p_1} \\ && B^3 U(1) \\ && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\rho}} \\ && B GL_1(tmf) \\ && \downarrow \\ && tmf Mod } $$ and hence land in $SU$-equivariant elliptic cohomology. ( Here I am using the pasting of homotopy pullbacks $$ \array{ B String &\to& B String^c &\to& B Spin \\ \downarrow && \downarrow && \downarrow \\ \ast &\to& B SU &\to& B^3 U(1) } $$ in order to identify $B String^c \simeq B String // SU$. ) I suppose that the twisted Witten genus should land in equivariant tmf this way is something that Matthew Ando has been suggesting, though I am not sure if I have seen the place where this is stated explicitly.

   Here is a question, probably for Charles (Rezk), if he sees it.

   The string orientation of tmf refines the un-twisted Witten genus on manifolds with String-structure. More generally, the Witten genus on a Spin-manifold is twisted by a complex vector bundle (“heterotic string”) and is a modular form for “String^c-structure”, characterized by .

   In the article

   • Qingtao Chen, Fei Han, Weiping Zhang, “Generalized Witten Genus and Vanishing Theorems” (arXiv:1003.2325)

   this twisted Witten genus on -structures is re-considered, and on p.2 an obvious question is mentioned: does the twisted Witten genus also have a “topological” lift to a map of spectra?

   Now, there is indeed an obious map of spectra , namely the hocolim over the left half of the diagram

   where denotes the homotopy that exhibits as the homotopy fiber of , and where is the twisting map exhibiting the plain string orientation of as in Ando-Blumberg-Gepner 10.

   My exercise is to check if that map

   induces on homotopy groups the twisted Witten genus, correctly.

   While I am slowly chewing on this, I thought I’d ask if anyone has considered this before. Quite likely this is clear to experts such as Charles.

   Or rather, possibly the push should be rather along the left half of

   and hence land in -equivariant elliptic cohomology.

   ( Here I am using the pasting of homotopy pullbacks

   in order to identify . )

   I suppose that the twisted Witten genus should land in equivariant tmf this way is something that Matthew Ando has been suggesting, though I am not sure if I have seen the place where this is stated explicitly.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorCharles Rezk
   • CommentTimeMar 28th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: Charles Rezk
   Format: MarkdownItexI am not an expert on this question. You should try Matt.

   I am not an expert on this question. You should try Matt.