Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory kan lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage nlab nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2014
    • (edited Apr 7th 2014)

    Probably we need a separate forum discussion for linear topological ring as otherwise it may get confusing over at completion of a ring.

    Zoran: thanks for the amendment. I was mostly interested in getting something down as a start, so did not explore the possiblities very much.

    You mentioned pseudocompact rings and formal schemes. Can you start up an entry heading in that direction. I had an idea of writing something on Grothendieck categories and their duals (Oberst’s paper) in an attempt to look at the relationship between pseudocompact rings and duality, but you may know more on this than I do.

    For formal schemes are you meaning in ordinary Alg. Geom or NCG?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2014
    • (edited Apr 7th 2014)

    I mean commutative algebraic geometry. SGA (I think in SGA3)…Grothendieck and Gabriel of course.

    The discussion on pseudocompact rings does belong more to the questions of completion or rings than to the discussion of the subject of linear topologies aka uniform filters (the latter has main interest in noncommutative algebra and geometry)!

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2014

    My main interest in pseudocompact rings is that the completed group rings of pro-finite groups have this form. (I am vaguely wondering about Hopf-like structures on them.)

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeApr 11th 2014

    I added the link to the Oberst paper.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 19th 2014

    New entries Gabriel-Oberst duality and colocalization under construction. Content welcome, but please do not add various formatting balast before the construction is finished, as my internet connection is not good.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeApr 19th 2014

    We had a discussion about colocalization. Anything worth retaining from it?

  1. Added: “Note that if RR is commutative then (i) implies (UF).”

    Anonymous

    diff, v8, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)