Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 15th 2014
• (edited May 15th 2014)
• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
• CommentTimeMay 15th 2014

Shouldn’t topological automorphic forms leave their trace on that table?

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 15th 2014

Probably. But I am not up to it yet.

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 17th 2014

Added precursor References and briefly pointed to the Existence statement.

Regarding precursors: apparently the idea to associate complex oriented cohomology theories with the Artin-Mazur formal groups of Calabi-Yau varieties in general dimension goes back to a lecture Michael Hopkins gave at the Midwest Topology Seminar in 1992. Is there any trace of that left?

(Searching for this is tedious, because authors carelessly write “Calabi-Yau cohomology” also for the ordinary cohomology _of_CYs)

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
• CommentTimeMay 18th 2014

• CommentRowNumber6.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJul 20th 2015

Added pointers to more lecture notes that I found on K3-cohomology and on topological automorphic forms.

Has anyone meanwhile looked into Calabi-Yau cohomology for 3d CYs?

• Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
• To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

• (Help)