Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Slide 68 of Riccioni’s talk E11 and M-theory also has a 10A row. Should there be one in your table?
And do you mean to have SL(5,ℝ) for 6d supergravity instead of his SO(5,5), and Spin(5,5) for 7d supergravity instead of his SL(5,ℝ)?
So those entries should be swapped, right? People seem to differ between SO(5,5) and Spin(5,5) for 6d.
Thanks. Yes. And yes.
I noticed this last night before going to bed: this is a typo in the original Hull-Townsend 95, table 1?! (Or I am mixed up.)
I am editing now.
Okay, I have fixed that.
So this is striking, that the only other entry besides 10B with SL(2,ℤ) whose U-duality might be related to automorphic forms (I mean SL-equivariant) is 7d.
In the other thread we are discussing how quantization of the 7d theory should involve the “CY3-generalization” of K3-cohomology…
Used unicode subscripts for indices of exceptional Lie groups in links. See discussion here. Links will be re-checked after all titles have been changed.
1 to 7 of 7