Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2014

    Created a stub for Urysohn metrization theorem.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2014

    I put a Topology ToC on the page.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2014

    Crosslinked with Pavel Urysohn

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeAug 3rd 2018

    Wrote out the proof of the metrization theorem.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeAug 3rd 2018
    • (edited Aug 3rd 2018)

    I was always curious if any of various metrization theorems (Urysohn, Nagata-Smirnov, Bing, Moore, etc.) have an application where it is not immediately obvious how to write down a metric without invoking these theorems. The same question was asked by Jesse Kass without success on MathOverflow:

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeAug 4th 2018

    That’s a very good question, Dmitri.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeAug 11th 2018
    • (edited Aug 11th 2018)

    Re #5, a possible test case is:

    If XX is a Hausdorff space that admits a continuous surjection f:[0,1]Xf: [0, 1] \to X, then XX is metrizable.

    Is it immediately obvious how to write down a metric for XX, given ff? I don’t know. A first guess might be to define the distance X(p,q)X(p, q) to be the Hausdorff metric between f 1(p)f^{-1}(p) and f 1(q)f^{-1}(q), but it’s not so clear that this metric topology coincides with the original topology on XX. The proofs of metrizability I’ve seen use ff pretty indirectly, concluding that XX is compact Hausdorff and second-countable, whereupon Urysohn metrization kicks in.

    The application then is to the “easy” direction of the Hahn-Mazurkiewicz theorem, the “only if” direction of the statement that a space is the continuous image of [0,1][0, 1] iff it is compact, metrizable, connected, and locally connected. It’s not quite an answer to the MO question, since that asked for a single space XX as opposed to a whole class of spaces.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2019

    Changed “named by Urysohn” to “named after Urysohn”

    diff, v9, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)