Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 11th 2014

    Over on MO (in the comments here) Stefan Wendt kindly reminds me of an old nnLab entry I once started on B1-homotopy theory. Have added a reference and hope to be adding more.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 12th 2014

    Following the reference to Ayoub there, I see his 2014 ICM talk is available. It begins

    The (co)homological invariants associated to an algebraic variety fall into two classes:

    (a) the algebro-geometric invariants such as higher Chow groups (measuring the complexity of algebraic cycles inside the variety) and Quillen K-theory groups (measuring the complexity of vector bundles over the variety);

    (b) the class of transcendental invariants such as Betti cohomology (with its mixed Hodge structure) and l-adic cohomology (with its Galois representation).

    The distinction between these two classes is extreme.

    Is this a form of fracturing?