Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeJul 27th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexI created [[generalized uniform structures - table]] in the style of all of those tables that Urs makes and included it on most of the relevant pages. (I left the pages on the simplest concepts, the binary relations.) I hope that the headers "monad on an object" and "monad on a pro-object" are accurate. These should be objects in an equipment, I think. Perhaps Mike can help me figure out what equipments are relevant here.

   I created generalized uniform structures - table in the style of all of those tables that Urs makes and included it on most of the relevant pages. (I left the pages on the simplest concepts, the binary relations.)

   I hope that the headers “monad on an object” and “monad on a pro-object” are accurate. These should be objects in an equipment, I think. Perhaps Mike can help me figure out what equipments are relevant here.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeJul 27th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexIt\'s a bit annoying that "pro" has two meanings here: one for something analogous to a profunctor, and one for something that\'s a formal projective limit.

   It's a bit annoying that “pro” has two meanings here: one for something analogous to a profunctor, and one for something that's a formal projective limit.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeAug 9th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexIt looks like the relevant equipments are all explained in the reference at [[prometric space]], which I\'m working through now. (In particular, I want to see if I can make it constructive.)

   It looks like the relevant equipments are all explained in the reference at prometric space, which I'm working through now. (In particular, I want to see if I can make it constructive.)