Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality education elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2014

    I think there was some terminological confusion, where the nLab defined Segal’s category Γ\Gamma to be a skeleton of finite pointed sets; I think it should be the category opposite to that. I’ve made edits at this article and at Gamma-space.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2014

    I have a memory (possibly false) of seeing both Γ\Gamma and its opposite called Segal’s category, so the main thing is to be reasonably consistent through any pages that use the term.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2014
    • (edited Dec 3rd 2014)

    Thanks Todd, for looking into this. In my experience (say from the beginnings of some seminar talks), as Tim says, people tend to disagree on this convention. But I suppose there is of course one that is really the original convention, and to the extend that we manage to, it would be good to try to stick to that, as you do. Thanks.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2014

    The problem, of course, is that the original definition of Γ\Gamma makes it analogous not to Δ\Delta but to Δ op\Delta^{op}. That makes it very tempting to redefine “Γ\Gamma” (perhaps even accidentally) so that it agrees with all other shape categories like Δ\Delta, where the “geometric shapes” in question are presheaves on the category. One solution is to just discard the notation Γ\Gamma and use something else like FinSet *FinSet_\ast or \mathcal{F}

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2014

    This may all be true, but unfortunately the articles were not even consistent with themselves! E.g. under the definition which was originally there, it was claimed that presheaves on Γ\Gamma classify pointed objects. But this is true only if we change to Segal’s original definition, where the forgetful functor Γ op=FinSet *Set\Gamma^{op} = FinSet_\ast \to Set is the generic model.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2014

    Oh certainly; I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. Thanks for fixing it!

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)