Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I have been added a first approximation to an Idea-section to torsion of a G-structure -
Have also added a pointer to Lott 90 and started a stub torsion constraints in supergravity, for the moment only to record some references.
Have also further touched related entries such as torsion of a Cartan connection.
Let me try to restate synthetically the characterization of integrable/torsion-free -structure the way Lott says it on p. 4 of arXiv:0108125:
Fix a model space with first order infinitesimal disk around the origin denoted . Assume that the canonical -bundle of is trivial.
Write .
Then (as we discussed in another thread recently) if any has a formally étale cover by -s then it carries a canonical frame bundle, modulated by some map .
Now fix any group and a map .
Then given an -manifold as above, a -structure on is equivalently a morphism
in the slice over .
So far this is clear. Now regarding how to say synthetically that this -structure is integrable/torsion free.
To that end, fix a -structure on the model space
.
Now I suppose we should say: the -structure on is integrable/torsion-free if there exists a formally étale cover such that this extends to a morphism of -structures, i.e. a morphism
in the slice over (which itself is in the slice over ).
So this just expresses that along each patch inclusion the -structure on restricts to the fixed one on the model space, up to equivalence
added pointer to today’s
1 to 3 of 3