Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory kan lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology natural nforum nlab nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 9th 2015

    Began stub for Tambara functor. Neil Strickland’s, Tambara Functors, arXiv:1205.2516 seems to be a good reference.

    Seems like it’s very much to do with pullpush through polynomial functors, if you look around p. 23.

    I would try to say what the idea is, but have to dash.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 10th 2015

    I extracted some further statements by Strickland.

    p. 24 of his article has XpAqBrYX \overset{p}{\leftarrow} A \overset{q}{\to} B \overset{r}{\to} Y as in polynomial functor which produces the same map composed of pullback of pp, dependent product for qq, dependent sum for rr.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 10th 2015

    That’s a very interesting catch you made there. I’ll look into this, thanks for pointing this out.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 10th 2015

    And it all links to Witt vectors, and so then back to arithmetic, as noted here.

    According to Joachim Kock Notes on polynomial functors, p. 192, Tambara first looked at a category which is the Lawvere theory for commutative semirings. So that fits with Strickland:

    One way to think about the definition of Mackey functors (for a finite group G) is as follows. Take the Lawvere theory A for (commutative) semigroups, categorify it, make it G-equivariant, decategorify, and then take the category of models for the resulting (multisorted) theory. This category is just the category of semigroup-valued Mackey functors, so it contains the more usual category of group-valued Mackey functors.

    The category of Tambara functors can be defined along the same lines as suggested above for Mackey functors. One simply starts with the Lawvere theory U for semirings instead of the theory A for semigroups.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 23rd 2015

    I added some more bits of pieces. Still not really sure what they’re for.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)