Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJun 15th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexI created [[Michal-Bastiani smooth map]], and linked to it from [[diffeological space]], [[Andree Ehresmann]] and [[locally convex topological vector space]].

   I created Michal-Bastiani smooth map, and linked to it from diffeological space, Andree Ehresmann and locally convex topological vector space.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJun 17th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexI've added an example to [[Michal-Bastiani smooth map]] that shows that $lctvs_{MB} \to lctvs_{convenient}$ is not even full on isomorphisms, supplied in an answer to by [MO question](http://mathoverflow.net/questions/209252/do-locally-convex-topological-vector-spaces-embed-into-diffeological-spaces). This is kinda interesting in that work on infinite-dimensional manifolds by Gloeckner and his circle is not quite compatible (in general) with treating generalised smooth spaces via sheaves on $Cart$. One thing I'd like to know is if we know a lctvs is such that it is faithfully represented (in some way: detecting smooth maps out or in by behaviour on smooth probes or co-probes from $Cart$) in $DiffeologicalSpace$, then it is from some particular class of spaces. This includes all Frechet spaces, but I don't know this class is bigger, or if we can even get an independent set of conditions...

   I’ve added an example to Michal-Bastiani smooth map that shows that $lctvs_{MB} \to lctvs_{convenient}$ is not even full on isomorphisms, supplied in an answer to by MO question.

   This is kinda interesting in that work on infinite-dimensional manifolds by Gloeckner and his circle is not quite compatible (in general) with treating generalised smooth spaces via sheaves on $Cart$.

   One thing I’d like to know is if we know a lctvs is such that it is faithfully represented (in some way: detecting smooth maps out or in by behaviour on smooth probes or co-probes from $Cart$) in $DiffeologicalSpace$, then it is from some particular class of spaces. This includes all Frechet spaces, but I don’t know this class is bigger, or if we can even get an independent set of conditions…

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 17th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex> work on infinite-dimensional manifolds by Gloeckner and his circle is not quite compatible (in general) with treating generalised smooth spaces via sheaves on Cart. As long as the functor is faithful there may be little harm: it means that everything that Gloeckner and his circle do holds true also in $Sh(CartSp)$, only that in the latter context more holds true, even (more maps are available).

   work on infinite-dimensional manifolds by Gloeckner and his circle is not quite compatible (in general) with treating generalised smooth spaces via sheaves on Cart.

   As long as the functor is faithful there may be little harm: it means that everything that Gloeckner and his circle do holds true also in $Sh(CartSp)$, only that in the latter context more holds true, even (more maps are available).

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJun 17th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItex> it means that everything that Gloeckner and his circle do holds true also in Sh(CartSp) Sure :-) I guess another question one might ask (and this is just following an idle thread) is whether there are MB-smooth bijections whose inverse is only conveniently smooth.

   it means that everything that Gloeckner and his circle do holds true also in Sh(CartSp)

   Sure :-)

   I guess another question one might ask (and this is just following an idle thread) is whether there are MB-smooth bijections whose inverse is only conveniently smooth.