Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
New article class equation, just to fill some gaps in the nLab literature. Truly elementary stuff.
Nice!
I have added the following remark:
Notice that reading the class equation equivalently as
∑orbitsx1|Stab(ax)|=|A||G|it expresses the groupoid cardinality of the action groupoid of G acting on A.
Thanks for the addition!
Replaced a proof that I had earlier adapted from Wikipedia with a cleaner proof that I learned from Benjamin Steinberg (Theorem 3.4). For archival purposes I will post the earlier proof here.
+– {: .proof}
(We adapt the proof from Wikipedia.) Let Pk=(Gpk) be the collection of subsets S of G of cardinality pk, and let G act on Pk by taking images of left translations, S↦gS. For S∈Pk, any h∈S yields a monomorphism
Stab(S)↪Gg↦gh→Gthat (by definition of Stab(S)) factors through S↪G; this gives a monomorphism Stab(S)→S, and so |Stab(S)|≤pk. Now we establish the reverse inequality for a suitable S. Writing n=pkm, we have
|Pk|=(pkmpk)=mpk−1∏j=1pkm−jpk−jwhere the product after m on the right is easily seen to be prime to p (any power of p that divides one of the numerators pkm−j also divides the denominator pk−j, so that powers of p in the product are canceled). Therefore ordp(|Pk|)=ordp(m); let r be this number. Writing out the class equation
|Pk|=∑orbitsx|G||Stab(Sx)|,not every term on the right can have p-order greater than r, so there is at least one orbit x where
ordp(|G||Stab(Sx)|)=ordp(|G|)−ordp(|Stab(Sx)|)≤r=ordp(m).We may rearrange this inequality to say ordp(|G|/m)≤ordp(|Stab(Sx)|); in other words pk=|G|/m divides |Stab(Sx)|. Therefore Stab(Sx) has order pk, which is what we wanted. =–
1 to 6 of 6