Processing math: 100%
Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJun 24th 2015

    New article class equation, just to fill some gaps in the nLab literature. Truly elementary stuff.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 24th 2015

    Nice!

    I have added the following remark:

    Notice that reading the class equation equivalently as

    orbitsx1|Stab(ax)|=|A||G|

    it expresses the groupoid cardinality of the action groupoid of G acting on A.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJun 24th 2015

    Thanks for the addition!

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 23rd 2018
    • (edited Sep 23rd 2018)

    Replaced a proof that I had earlier adapted from Wikipedia with a cleaner proof that I learned from Benjamin Steinberg (Theorem 3.4). For archival purposes I will post the earlier proof here.

    +– {: .proof}

    Proof

    (We adapt the proof from Wikipedia.) Let Pk=(Gpk) be the collection of subsets S of G of cardinality pk, and let G act on Pk by taking images of left translations, SgS. For SPk, any hS yields a monomorphism

    Stab(S)GgghG

    that (by definition of Stab(S)) factors through SG; this gives a monomorphism Stab(S)S, and so |Stab(S)|pk. Now we establish the reverse inequality for a suitable S. Writing n=pkm, we have

    |Pk|=(pkmpk)=mpk1j=1pkmjpkj

    where the product after m on the right is easily seen to be prime to p (any power of p that divides one of the numerators pkmj also divides the denominator pkj, so that powers of p in the product are canceled). Therefore ordp(|Pk|)=ordp(m); let r be this number. Writing out the class equation

    |Pk|=orbitsx|G||Stab(Sx)|,

    not every term on the right can have p-order greater than r, so there is at least one orbit x where

    ordp(|G||Stab(Sx)|)=ordp(|G|)ordp(|Stab(Sx)|)r=ordp(m).

    We may rearrange this inequality to say ordp(|G|/m)ordp(|Stab(Sx)|); in other words pk=|G|/m divides |Stab(Sx)|. Therefore Stab(Sx) has order pk, which is what we wanted. =–

    diff, v10, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJan 2nd 2023

    Added a corollary and a sample application of the Sylow theorems.

    diff, v18, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorJohn Baez
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2024

    Pointed out that the ’class formula’ is also called ’Burnside’s lemma’, and added a link to the Wikipedia article on that.

    diff, v20, current