Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
am beginning to add some genuine content to Ruelle zeta function (which used to just redirect to zeta function of a dynamical system which in turn is no more that a stub)
not done yet
The page zeta function of a dyanimcal system says
When interpreting the Frobenius morphisms that appear in the Artin L-functions geometrically as flows (as discussed at Borger’s arithmetic geometry – Motivation) then this induces an evident analog of zeta function of a dynamical system.
Could we replace “induces” by “motivates”? Confusingly to a mathematician, inducing is usually about a formal procedure how to transfer the information in one structure to get another structure (induced topology, induced representation etc.); but I suspect that here it is just an analogical thinking and not a priori well defined procedure of transfering the definition to another realm…
Also, the Ruelle zeta function is defined more widely than for hyperbolic manifolds of odd dimension. I noticed this having commented on a post on a formula of Feynman for the Ising model. So I’ve added a broader definition.
Added the notes Dynamical zeta functions on the arXiv today as a reference.
1 to 4 of 4