Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
   • CommentTimeJul 9th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Dmitri Pavlov
   Format: MarkdownItexI created the article [[left-determined model category]].

   I created the article left-determined model category.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
   • CommentTimeJul 9th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Dmitri Pavlov
   Format: MarkdownItexWeird that the [[Vopěnka principle]] link doesn't work.

   Weird that the Vopěnka principle link doesn’t work.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJul 9th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexOn it.

   On it.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJul 9th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexI hyperlinked the dois and arXiv reference, and the in-text references to the References section.

   I hyperlinked the dois and arXiv reference, and the in-text references to the References section.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
   • CommentTimeJul 9th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Dmitri Pavlov
   Format: MarkdownItexGreat, thanks a lot! Every time I create a new article on the nLab, I faithfully try to do my best at formatting, but the syntax is so weird that I forget it every time (and I don't write articles often enough to remember it). As much as I dislike LaTeX's ultraverbose syntax, its \ref{…}/\label{…} and \cite{…}/\bibitem{…} are still orders of magnitude better than what we have to use now. Is there any chance that something like ref/label/cite/bibitem could be added to Instiki?

   Great, thanks a lot!

   Every time I create a new article on the nLab, I faithfully try to do my best at formatting, but the syntax is so weird that I forget it every time (and I don’t write articles often enough to remember it).

   As much as I dislike LaTeX’s ultraverbose syntax, its \ref{…}/\label{…} and \cite{…}/\bibitem{…} are still orders of magnitude better than what we have to use now.

   Is there any chance that something like ref/label/cite/bibitem could be added to Instiki?

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJul 9th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat is better about ref/label than the current system for referring to theorems? As far as I see the only difference is to write `#name` after the theorem environment rather than `\label{name}`, which doesn't seem like an order of magnitude difference. I do agree that the citation method is a little annoying, though.

   What is better about ref/label than the current system for referring to theorems? As far as I see the only difference is to write #name after the theorem environment rather than \label{name}, which doesn’t seem like an order of magnitude difference.

   I do agree that the citation method is a little annoying, though.