Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexThe [[FAQ]] says under the heading "My LaTeX produces gobbledygook in iTeX and vice versa" that > `$t^3,2$` renders as $t^3,2$ instead of $t^{3},2$ but to me, both renderings look the same, with the ",2" outside the superscript. Has iTeX changed since this FAQ was written?

   The FAQ says under the heading “My LaTeX produces gobbledygook in iTeX and vice versa” that

   $t^3,2$ renders as $t^3,2$ instead of $t^{3},2$

   but to me, both renderings look the same, with the “,2” outside the superscript. Has iTeX changed since this FAQ was written?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexPerhaps, or perhaps it was supposed to be a period all along: $t^3.2$.

   Perhaps, or perhaps it was supposed to be a period all along: $t^3.2$.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI think the surrounding text makes it clear that it was supposed to be a comma.

   I think the surrounding text makes it clear that it was supposed to be a comma.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeDec 7th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexThe text makes it clear that it was expected to work with either. I don\'t know if it ever did work with either, and if so, for which versions of iTeX. I\'ve changed the example to use a period, so that it works, with a comment about how strange it is that the comma behaves differently now.

   The text makes it clear that it was expected to work with either. I don't know if it ever did work with either, and if so, for which versions of iTeX.

   I've changed the example to use a period, so that it works, with a comment about how strange it is that the comma behaves differently now.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeDec 7th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexThere appears to be another change; the last item under gobbledygook claims that `$\text{∞}$` shouldn\'t parse, but it does. (There\'s even a helpful example to show that the text is wrong!) I can rewrite that, but I thought that I\'d point it out first.

   There appears to be another change; the last item under gobbledygook claims that $\text{∞}$ shouldn't parse, but it does. (There's even a helpful example to show that the text is wrong!) I can rewrite that, but I thought that I'd point it out first.